"The ownership of an author's manuscript after his death, where such ownership has been acquired under a testamentary disposition made by the author and the manuscript is of a work which has not been published nor performed in public, shall be prima facie proof of the copyright being with the owner of the manuscript." Had die regeling terugwerkende kracht? Zo ja, was het dan niet zo dat de term my copyrights in Dickens'testament eigenlijk alleen maar sloeg op gepubliceerd werk en niet op het manuscript dat aan Georgina werd nagelaten als my private papers. Bovendien: wat zijn private papers eigenlijk? Judge Bennet gaat die laatste problemen voorbij door te beslissen dat de wet van 1911 geen terugwerkende kracht heeft. Dan blijft alleen Georgina's common law property right over. Op grond daarvan kan ze soms wel publicatie verbieden, maar heeft ze nog geen auteursrechten. In hoger beroep bevestigt Lord Hanworth deze uitspraak. Hij vraagt zich echter af hoeveel de uitgever zou hebben betaald, wanneer hij alleen maar een niet oorspronkelijk exemplaar van het manuscript had mogen inzien. Waarschijnlijk zou dat bedrag veel lager zijn geweest, omdat dan niet zeker was of hij wel de werkeüjke tekst van Dickens onder ogen had gekregen. Dat hij nu het echte origineel kon uitgeven, was mede mogelijk gemaakt door de eigenaren van het manuscript. Doe moesten dus redelijkerwijs ook wat van de opbrengst krijgen. Hoeveel? Daar is een eenvoudig antwoord op: Equity delights in equality, zoals Lord Somers in 1695 in de zaak Petit v. Smith al had geoordeeld. De helft dus van de totale afkoopsom voor het auteursrecht. DICKENS'S LIFE OF CHRIST iVl'ft FAMILY AGREE TO ITS PUBLICATION KoüX 3 HIGH COURT COPYRIGHT DECISION ~Hf: 7:3L. Mr. Justice Bennett, in the Chancery Division, yesterday, delivered his re served. judgment on the question as to the devolution of the copyright of Charles Dickens's Life of Our Lord," which appeared exclusively'in The Daily Mail last March. l?he parties in the case were Lady Dickens, jvidow of Sir Henry Fielding Dickens, K.C., the novelist's son, and their children, who were beneficially interested in the estate of Miss Georgina Hogarth, and. Miss Ethel" Dickens, a grandchild of the novelist, who repre sented the residuary legatees under his will- The manuscriDt, which had been left under the will of Miss Georgina Hogarth, sister-in-law of Charles Dickens, to Sir Henry Dickens, and bea.ueathed by him in turn to Lady Dickens, has not itself been sold. Mr. Justice Bennett decided on June 7 that the manuscript was a private paper and passed to Miss Georgina Hogarth under Dickens's bequest to her. He de cided yesterday that the Copyright Act of 1U11 did not give her a beneficial in terest in the copyright which she did not Dossess before. On her death it passed to her executor, Sir Henry Dickens, and on his death to his executrix, Lady Dickens but she held it on the trusts of the will of Charles Dickens as part of his residuary estate. A declaration was accordingly made in favour of the residuary legatees. It is understood that Charles Dickens's Life of our Lord may soon be published, as the result' of the will.of the late Sir Henry Dickens (the last surviving son of the novelist), which was made public during the week-end. Sir Henry, who was Common Serjeant of the City of London for 16 years, died' last month, at the age of 84. He left £19,892. FAMILY TO DECIDE In his will Sir Henry bequeaths to Lady Dickens the original manu script of his father's "Life of Our Lord," and adds I have felt constrained to act upon my father's expressed desire that it should not be published, but I do not think itright that J should bind, my children by any such view, especially as I can find no specific injunction against such publication. I therefore direct that my wife and my children should consider this ques tion quite unfettered by any view of mine; and if by a majority they decide that the manuscript should not be published I direct my wife to deposit it with the trustees of. the British Museum. But if they decide by a majority that it should be published, then I direct tny wife to sell the same'in trust, to divide the net proceeds of such sale among my wife»and all my children, m i-equalfshar.es.".- In a tribute to "his wife Sir Henry says I desire to express to her my deepest and most affectionate gratitude for her loving and unfailing devotion, which, together with the love of all my, dear children, has made my life one of constant and un qualified happiness." gIR,—We are keenly looking forward to reading Diekens' Life of Our Lord." It is wonderful that, you ar.e able to make it available to "all. Recently there was an article in The Daily Mail about Charles Dickens and his wife. My father was first cousin to Kate Hogarth, w h.o s e f a m i ly introduced Dickens into, liter a r y and. artistic society. After hei marriage to Dickens Kate made the mis take of insisting or Mary, her sister, liv ing with them. Kate did not, and woulc not,. - und-erst anc .Charles... Dickens nervousand highly strung temperament he would not leavt off writing (or meals or have any inter ruption, and wher trays of food were left untouched out side his door, poor Kate would dis solve into tears and have vapours, whicl were so fashionable in "those days, for hour: at a time. The result was that when Charle: Dickens came out ready for dinner o to attend any social affair. Mary had to g( in her place Kate was temperamental, bu certainly not mental," as we use the wore now. Elizabeth Hogarth, Werne Cottage, Langport, Somerset,. Mrs. Dickens Kate Hogarth). Long ago, Mrs. Kate Perugini, the novelist's daughter, deposited a box of intimate papers about her father at the Museum This box was to have been opened in 1920. But in 1920 the late Sir Henry Fielding Dickens objected. Not till I am dead] he said to the Museum Trustees; and they accepted his objection. Last week, unhappily, Sir Henry died, and now no child of Charles Dickens remains alive. Therefore, there is no longer any personal reason why this box of. Dickens' papers should not be made available to students.

Krantenviewer Noord-Hollands Archief

The Dutch Dickensian | 2003 | | pagina 26