Zomer 2005 no. 53 De latere leden: The Dutch Dickensian Volume XXV over dit schilderij het volgende: "You behold the interior of a carpenter's shop. In the foreground of that carpenter's shop is a hidious, wry- necked, blubbering, red-haired boy in a nightgown, who appears to have recieved a poke playing in an adjecent gutter, and to be holding it up for the contemplation of a kneeling woman, so horrible in her ugliness that (supposing it were possible for any human creature to excistfor a moment with that dislocated throat) she would stand out from the rest of the company as a monster in the vilest cabaret in France or in the lowest gin-shop in England"6. Hoe oprecht Dickens in zijn kritiek was is echter nog maar de vraag. Op de de site van het Victoriaweb staat dat hij zo uit zijn slof schoot nadat de Pre-Raphaelieten kritiek op zijn vriend Tom Taylor, de kunstcriticus van de Times hadden geuit. William Morris (1834-1896) Edward Burne-Jones (1833-98) Ford Madox Brown (1821-93) John Ruskin (1819-1900) Walter Deverell (1827-1854) Algernon Charles Swinburne (1837-1909) Op de tentoonstelling van 1851 was het weer raak. Ditmaal schrijft hij een brief naar de Times7 om zijn ongenoegen over de schilderijen te uiten. Ook zijn latere schoonzoon Charles Collins die inmiddels qua stijl in de richting van de broederschap was geëvolueerd krijgt ervan langs: "We cannot censure at present as amply or as strongly as we desire to do, that strange disorder of the mind or the eyes which continues to rage with unabated absurdity among a class of juvenile artists who style themselves P.R.B., which, being interpreted, means Pre-Raphael-brethren. Their faith seems to consist in an absolute contempt for perspective and the known laws of light and shade, an aversion to beauty in every shape, and a singular devotion to the minute accidents of their subjects, including, or rather seeking out, every excess of sharpness and deformity. Mr. Millais, Mr. Hunt, Mr. Collins - and in some degree - Mr. Brown, Madox Brown] the author of a huge picture of Chaucer, have undertaken to reform the art on these principles. In the North Room will be found, too, Mr. Millais' picture of 'The Woodman's Daughter', from some verses by Mr. Coventry Patmore, and as the same remarks will apply to the pictures of the same artist, 'The Return of the Dove to the Ark' (651and Tennyson's 'Mariana' (561 as well as to similar works by Mr. Collins, as 'Convent Thoughts' (493), and to Mr. Hunt's 'Valentine receiving Proteus' (59), [Valentine Rescuing Sylvia from Proteus] we shall venture to express our opinion on them all in this place. These young artists have unfortunately become notorious by addicting themselves to an antiquated style and an affected simplicity in painting, which is to genuine art what the medieval ballads and designs in Punch are to Chaucer and Giotto. With the utmost readiness to humour even the caprices of Art when they bear the stamp of originality and genius, we can extend no toleration to a mere servile imitation of the cramped style, false perspective, and crude colour of remote antiquity. We do not want to see what Fuseli termed drapery 'snapped instead of folded', faces bloated into apoplexy or extenuated to skeletons, colour borrowed from the jars in a druggist's shop, and expression forced into caricature. It is said that the gentlemen have the power to do better things, and we are referred in proof of their handicraft to the mistaken skill with which they have transferred to canvas the hay which lined the lofts in Noah's Ark, [Millais' 'The Return of the Dove to the Ark'], the brown leaves of the coppice where Sylvia strayed, Hunt's 'Valentine Rescuing Sylvia from Proteus', from Shakespeare's play 'Two Gentlemen of Verona'] and the prim vegetables of a monastic garden, Charles Collins' 'Convent Thoughts']. But we must doubt a capacity of which we have seen so little proof, and if any such capacity did ever exist in them, we fear that it has already been overlaid by mannerism and conceit. To become great in art, it has been said that a painter must 6 Hilton biz. 52. 7 Times 7 mei 1851 3 0 u'A

Krantenviewer Noord-Hollands Archief

The Dutch Dickensian | 2005 | | pagina 35