46 It seems very hard to ascertain what Charles Dickens's main sources of inspiration in his usage of dreams were - be they nightmares, visionary dreams, dreams as an outlet of reality or daydreams. It is quite probable that the idea was borrowed from the Bible and then adapted in form to his own purposes. Freud and his followers have shown a great many thoughts and popular beliefs about dreams to be true - as we learn from the incident recounted by Lionel Trilling where Freud gives credit to the philosophers and poets of having discovered the unconscious when he 39 merely found the scientific method of studying it. As quoted before, ..40 he said "Dreams are the royal road to the unconscious. He repeats an old insight. As Dickens never knew any Freud we must conclude that he relied on his intuition and imagination to understand the signifi cance of dreams. If we think of Dickens's hard and dismal youth, it seems likely enough to conclude that he daydreamed as a means of escape as some of the characters he created also did. In Dickens's novels the reader is given more of the atmosphere than the thoughts of a character. It seems as though Dickens avoided looking his characters in the face as if he was afraid of what he was going to see there In DAVID COPPERFIELD, written in 1850, the dreams are less relevant to David's inner life and to the novel itself than in GREAT EXPECTATIONS, written in 1861, where they are very telling indeed of Pip's state of mind, so the conclusion that in Dickens there was a growing awareness of the importance of the dream seems legitimate. Whoever loves, lives and whoever lives, dreams. In their dreams people are shown as they really are and who dreams seems to me to be a real person. For a long time poets have continued to be fascinated by the relationship between waking reality and the dream and many have asked with Poe: Is all that we see or seem 41 But a dream within a dream -0-

Krantenviewer Noord-Hollands Archief

The Dutch Dickensian | 1985 | | pagina 48