novelists). These two authors are moulded, not only by their respective geographical and social origins, but also by current assumptions about their chosen literary genres. Thus, Dickens is abundantly comic in his novels, and would doubtless have agreed with Troliope's off-hand definition of the novel: "A novel should give a picture of common life, enlivened by humour and sweetened by pathos." Tennyson often maintained that "It is only men of humour who see things as they really are." and a friend remarked "Did anybody make one laugh more heartily than Alfred Tennyson?" Well, he rarely attempts to, in his poetry: "Serious" Victorian poetry mostly found it as difficult to accommodate humour as to depict urban life: the poetic inherited, from the Romantics was of little help here. Thus Matthew Arnold, who held that "genuine poetry is conceived and composed in the soul" (not in the "wits", as Dryden and Pope had mistakenly thought) managed to write a preface to Byron without mentioning 'Beppo' or 'Don Juan'. Both Dickens and Tennyson were of course unhappy about much in their England (not always about the same things). "Of all great Victorian writers," Edmund Wilson argued, "Dickens was probably the most antagonistic to the Victorian Age itself." "Nearly all the eminent Victorian writers," says his fellow-American E.D.H.Johnson, "were as often as not at odds with their age, and in their best work they habitually appealed not to, but against the prevailing mores of that age" (he applies this to Tennyson). Well, there are get-out clauses there ("probably", "in their best work") but it is hard to see how authors radically antagonistic to their age could have commanded all that homage and cash. To criticize the age was part of the spirit of the age; it was "a changing age" in which many changes were arguably for the better and were overdue. "The old order changeth, yielding place to new," to quote the favourite Tennysonian tag - or "Our little systems have their day/They have their day and cease to be." and that was true of more "systems" than religious ones. Writers, particularly social novelists like Dickens, tried to hasten the process. For Tennyson around 1847 the two great social questions impending in England were "the housing and education of the poor man before making him our master [i.e.giving him the vote], and the higher education of women." Tennyson could make nothing poetically of the first "question" (here instead one thinks of Dickens) but his first long poem, The Princess, is concerned with the second. Certainly reviewers of the time, though sometimes annoyed by (say) Dickens's political radicalism, much more often stressed his and Tennyson's speaking for and to, not against, their age. "The present age, taken in the lump likes Mr Tennyson's poetry... because he speaks its mind for it more efficiently than anybody else" Temple Bar, 1869). "Tennyson is the most modern of poets... Lesser poets may represent more fully the transient phases, the accidents of the passing time; but it is Tennyson who gives us back the true characteristics in small as in great matters... He is touched with the triumphant, somewhat boastful temper of an age of physical discovery"

Krantenviewer Noord-Hollands Archief

The Dutch Dickensian | 1989 | | pagina 62